From 23a4fe5b27c191eae1dde05aa522463e67b0766f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Markus Sauermann <6299227+Sauermann@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2022 17:55:48 +0100
Subject: Fix incorrect Rect2i calculations: intersects and encloses Clarify
 expand documentation

---
 tests/core/math/test_rect2.h | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

(limited to 'tests')

diff --git a/tests/core/math/test_rect2.h b/tests/core/math/test_rect2.h
index e07250a8a2..d98a94b1b5 100644
--- a/tests/core/math/test_rect2.h
+++ b/tests/core/math/test_rect2.h
@@ -439,6 +439,9 @@ TEST_CASE("[Rect2i] Enclosing") {
 	CHECK_MESSAGE(
 			!Rect2i(0, 100, 1280, 720).encloses(Rect2i(-4000, -4000, 100, 100)),
 			"encloses() with non-contained Rect2i should return the expected result.");
+	CHECK_MESSAGE(
+			Rect2i(0, 100, 1280, 720).encloses(Rect2i(0, 100, 1280, 720)),
+			"encloses() with identical Rect2i should return the expected result.");
 }
 
 TEST_CASE("[Rect2i] Expanding") {
@@ -557,6 +560,9 @@ TEST_CASE("[Rect2i] Intersection") {
 	CHECK_MESSAGE(
 			!Rect2i(0, 100, 1280, 720).intersects(Rect2i(-4000, -4000, 100, 100)),
 			"intersects() with non-enclosed Rect2i should return the expected result.");
+	CHECK_MESSAGE(
+			!Rect2i(0, 0, 2, 2).intersects(Rect2i(2, 2, 2, 2)),
+			"intersects() with adjacent Rect2i should return the expected result.");
 }
 
 TEST_CASE("[Rect2i] Merging") {
-- 
cgit v1.2.3