diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/builtin_openssl2/crypto/aes/asm/aes-586.pl')
| -rwxr-xr-x | drivers/builtin_openssl2/crypto/aes/asm/aes-586.pl | 6 |
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/builtin_openssl2/crypto/aes/asm/aes-586.pl b/drivers/builtin_openssl2/crypto/aes/asm/aes-586.pl index 687ed811be..51b500ddef 100755 --- a/drivers/builtin_openssl2/crypto/aes/asm/aes-586.pl +++ b/drivers/builtin_openssl2/crypto/aes/asm/aes-586.pl @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ # the undertaken effort was that it appeared that in tight IA-32 # register window little-endian flavor could achieve slightly higher # Instruction Level Parallelism, and it indeed resulted in up to 15% -# better performance on most recent µ-archs... +# better performance on most recent µ-archs... # # Third version adds AES_cbc_encrypt implementation, which resulted in # up to 40% performance imrovement of CBC benchmark results. 40% was @@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ sub _data_word() { my $i; while(defined($i=shift)) { &data_word($i,$i); } } $speed_limit=512; # chunks smaller than $speed_limit are # processed with compact routine in CBC mode $small_footprint=1; # $small_footprint=1 code is ~5% slower [on - # recent µ-archs], but ~5 times smaller! + # recent µ-archs], but ~5 times smaller! # I favor compact code to minimize cache # contention and in hope to "collect" 5% back # in real-life applications... @@ -562,7 +562,7 @@ sub enctransform() # Performance is not actually extraordinary in comparison to pure # x86 code. In particular encrypt performance is virtually the same. # Decrypt performance on the other hand is 15-20% better on newer -# µ-archs [but we're thankful for *any* improvement here], and ~50% +# µ-archs [but we're thankful for *any* improvement here], and ~50% # better on PIII:-) And additionally on the pros side this code # eliminates redundant references to stack and thus relieves/ # minimizes the pressure on the memory bus. |