diff options
author | Ignacio Etcheverry <ignalfonsore@gmail.com> | 2020-05-22 01:51:05 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Ignacio Etcheverry <ignalfonsore@gmail.com> | 2020-05-22 01:52:32 +0200 |
commit | ecd0cccc765213c0bb7e17ab148d46633276f50f (patch) | |
tree | 0f290adede5db523dcb4fc30ea423bc812d33dff | |
parent | 9239412027b6c25009efab69dc39650e0d76c56d (diff) |
Fix condition in ClassDB tests that should return
Also changed the name of the test macros to be clearer.
-rw-r--r-- | main/tests/test_class_db.cpp | 68 |
1 files changed, 34 insertions, 34 deletions
diff --git a/main/tests/test_class_db.cpp b/main/tests/test_class_db.cpp index 4c00a09e9c..3171091402 100644 --- a/main/tests/test_class_db.cpp +++ b/main/tests/test_class_db.cpp @@ -44,21 +44,21 @@ enum class [[nodiscard]] TestResult{ PASS }; -#define TEST_FAIL_COND_FATAL(m_cond, m_msg) \ - if (unlikely(m_cond)) { \ - ERR_PRINT(m_msg); \ - return TestResult::FAILED; \ - } else \ +#define TEST_FAIL_COND(m_cond, m_msg) \ + if (unlikely(m_cond)) { \ + ERR_PRINT(m_msg); \ + return TestResult::FAILED; \ + } else \ ((void)0) -#define TEST_FAIL_COND(m_cond, m_msg) \ +#define TEST_COND(m_cond, m_msg) \ if (unlikely(m_cond)) { \ ERR_PRINT(m_msg); \ __test_result__ = TestResult::FAILED; \ } else \ ((void)0) -#define TEST_CHECK_FATAL(m_test_expr) \ +#define TEST_FAIL_CHECK(m_test_expr) \ if (unlikely((m_test_expr) == TestResult::FAILED)) { \ return TestResult::FAILED; \ } else \ @@ -229,18 +229,18 @@ struct Context { return elem ? &elem.value() : nullptr; } - bool has_type(const Context &p_context, const TypeReference &p_type_ref) const { - if (p_context.builtin_types.find(p_type_ref.name) >= 0) { + bool has_type(const TypeReference &p_type_ref) const { + if (builtin_types.find(p_type_ref.name) >= 0) { return true; } if (p_type_ref.is_enum) { - if (p_context.enum_types.find(p_type_ref.name) >= 0) { + if (enum_types.find(p_type_ref.name) >= 0) { return true; } // Enum not found. Most likely because none of its constants were bound, so it's empty. That's fine. Use int instead. - return p_context.builtin_types.find(p_context.names_cache.int_type); + return builtin_types.find(names_cache.int_type); } return false; @@ -370,10 +370,10 @@ TestResult validate_property(const Context &p_context, const ExposedClass &p_cla const ExposedClass *prop_class = p_context.find_exposed_class(prop_type_ref); if (prop_class) { - TEST_FAIL_COND(prop_class->is_singleton, + TEST_COND(prop_class->is_singleton, "Property type is a singleton: '" + p_class.name + "." + String(p_prop.name) + "'."); } else { - TEST_FAIL_COND(!p_context.has_type(p_context, prop_type_ref), + TEST_FAIL_COND(!p_context.has_type(prop_type_ref), "Property type '" + prop_type_ref.name + "' not found: '" + p_class.name + "." + String(p_prop.name) + "'."); } @@ -382,7 +382,7 @@ TestResult validate_property(const Context &p_context, const ExposedClass &p_cla const ArgumentData &idx_arg = getter->arguments.front()->get(); if (idx_arg.type.name != p_context.names_cache.int_type) { // If not an int, it can be an enum - TEST_FAIL_COND(p_context.enum_types.find(idx_arg.type.name) < 0, + TEST_COND(p_context.enum_types.find(idx_arg.type.name) < 0, "Invalid type '" + idx_arg.type.name + "' for index argument of property getter: '" + p_class.name + "." + String(p_prop.name) + "'."); } } @@ -394,7 +394,7 @@ TestResult validate_property(const Context &p_context, const ExposedClass &p_cla if (idx_arg.type.name != p_context.names_cache.int_type) { // Assume the index parameter is an enum // If not an int, it can be an enum - TEST_FAIL_COND(p_context.enum_types.find(idx_arg.type.name) < 0, + TEST_COND(p_context.enum_types.find(idx_arg.type.name) < 0, "Invalid type '" + idx_arg.type.name + "' for index argument of property setter: '" + p_class.name + "." + String(p_prop.name) + "'."); } } @@ -408,7 +408,7 @@ TestResult validate_method(const Context &p_context, const ExposedClass &p_class const ExposedClass *return_class = p_context.find_exposed_class(p_method.return_type); if (return_class) { - TEST_FAIL_COND(return_class->is_singleton, + TEST_COND(return_class->is_singleton, "Method return type is a singleton: '" + p_class.name + "." + p_method.name + "'."); } @@ -417,15 +417,15 @@ TestResult validate_method(const Context &p_context, const ExposedClass &p_class const ExposedClass *arg_class = p_context.find_exposed_class(arg.type); if (arg_class) { - TEST_FAIL_COND(arg_class->is_singleton, + TEST_COND(arg_class->is_singleton, "Argument type is a singleton: '" + arg.name + "' of method '" + p_class.name + "." + p_method.name + "'."); } else { - TEST_FAIL_COND(!p_context.has_type(p_context, arg.type), + TEST_FAIL_COND(!p_context.has_type(arg.type), "Argument type '" + arg.type.name + "' not found: '" + arg.name + "' of method" + p_class.name + "." + p_method.name + "'."); } if (arg.has_defval) { - TEST_FAIL_COND(!arg_default_value_is_assignable_to_type(p_context, arg.defval, arg.type), + TEST_COND(!arg_default_value_is_assignable_to_type(p_context, arg.defval, arg.type), "Invalid default value for parameter '" + arg.name + "' of method '" + p_class.name + "." + p_method.name + "'."); } } @@ -441,10 +441,10 @@ TestResult validate_signal(const Context &p_context, const ExposedClass &p_class const ExposedClass *arg_class = p_context.find_exposed_class(arg.type); if (arg_class) { - TEST_FAIL_COND(arg_class->is_singleton, + TEST_COND(arg_class->is_singleton, "Argument class is a singleton: '" + arg.name + "' of signal" + p_class.name + "." + p_signal.name + "'."); } else { - TEST_FAIL_COND(!p_context.has_type(p_context, arg.type), + TEST_FAIL_COND(!p_context.has_type(arg.type), "Argument type '" + arg.type.name + "' not found: '" + arg.name + "' of signal" + p_class.name + "." + p_signal.name + "'."); } } @@ -459,20 +459,20 @@ TestResult validate_class(const Context &p_context, const ExposedClass &p_expose if (!is_derived_type) { // Asserts about the base Object class - TEST_FAIL_COND_FATAL(p_exposed_class.name != p_context.names_cache.object_class, + TEST_FAIL_COND(p_exposed_class.name != p_context.names_cache.object_class, "Class '" + p_exposed_class.name + "' has no base class."); - TEST_FAIL_COND_FATAL(!p_exposed_class.is_instantiable, + TEST_FAIL_COND(!p_exposed_class.is_instantiable, "Object class is not instantiable."); - TEST_FAIL_COND_FATAL(p_exposed_class.api_type != ClassDB::API_CORE, + TEST_FAIL_COND(p_exposed_class.api_type != ClassDB::API_CORE, "Object class is API is not API_CORE."); - TEST_FAIL_COND_FATAL(p_exposed_class.is_singleton, + TEST_FAIL_COND(p_exposed_class.is_singleton, "Object class is registered as a singleton."); } - CRASH_COND_MSG(p_exposed_class.is_singleton && p_exposed_class.base != p_context.names_cache.object_class, + TEST_FAIL_COND(p_exposed_class.is_singleton && p_exposed_class.base != p_context.names_cache.object_class, "Singleton base class '" + String(p_exposed_class.base) + "' is not Object, for class '" + p_exposed_class.name + "'."); - CRASH_COND_MSG(is_derived_type && !p_context.exposed_classes.has(p_exposed_class.base), + TEST_FAIL_COND(is_derived_type && !p_context.exposed_classes.has(p_exposed_class.base), "Base type '" + p_exposed_class.base.operator String() + "' does not exist, for class '" + p_exposed_class.name + "'."); for (const List<PropertyData>::Element *F = p_exposed_class.properties.front(); F; F = F->next()) { @@ -619,9 +619,9 @@ TestResult add_exposed_classes(Context &r_context) { bool bad_reference_hint = !method.is_virtual && return_info.hint != PROPERTY_HINT_RESOURCE_TYPE && ClassDB::is_parent_class(return_info.class_name, r_context.names_cache.reference_class); - TEST_FAIL_COND(bad_reference_hint, String() + "Return type is reference but hint is not '" _STR(PROPERTY_HINT_RESOURCE_TYPE) "'." + - " Are you returning a reference type by pointer? Method: '" + - exposed_class.name + "." + method.name + "'."); + TEST_COND(bad_reference_hint, String() + "Return type is reference but hint is not '" _STR(PROPERTY_HINT_RESOURCE_TYPE) "'." + + " Are you returning a reference type by pointer? Method: '" + + exposed_class.name + "." + method.name + "'."); } else if (return_info.hint == PROPERTY_HINT_RESOURCE_TYPE) { method.return_type.name = return_info.hint_string; } else if (return_info.type == Variant::NIL && return_info.usage & PROPERTY_USAGE_NIL_IS_VARIANT) { @@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ TestResult add_exposed_classes(Context &r_context) { method.arguments.push_back(vararg); } - TEST_FAIL_COND(exposed_class.find_property_by_name(method.name), + TEST_COND(exposed_class.find_property_by_name(method.name), "Method name conflicts with property: '" + String(class_name) + "." + String(method.name) + "'."); // Classes starting with an underscore are ignored unless they're used as a property setter or getter @@ -851,13 +851,13 @@ TestResult run_class_db_tests() { Context context; - TEST_CHECK_FATAL(add_exposed_classes(context)); + TEST_FAIL_CHECK(add_exposed_classes(context)); add_builtin_types(context); add_global_enums(context); const ExposedClass *object_class = context.find_exposed_class(context.names_cache.object_class); - TEST_FAIL_COND_FATAL(!object_class, "Object class not found."); - TEST_FAIL_COND_FATAL(object_class->base != StringName(), + TEST_FAIL_COND(!object_class, "Object class not found."); + TEST_FAIL_COND(object_class->base != StringName(), "Object class derives from another class: '" + object_class->base + "'."); for (ExposedClasses::Element E = context.exposed_classes.front(); E; E = E.next()) { |